Microsoft announced last week that it has entered into a patent licensing agreement with Nikon for Nikon’s Android-powered digital cameras.
You might be wondering what Android has to do with all of this, since it’s not a Microsoft software. Android is a Google-backed, Linux-based, open-source operating system, but just because it’s free software doesn't mean it has been cheap for device manufacturers to use it on their devices. The reason? Patent claims.
Do we work in an innovative or protective environment? Today companies purchase enterprises partially just for their patents, like Google who bought Motorola. I totally agree that an invention or work of art belongs to the creator and that rules must be followed, but the lawyers shouldn't hijack and rule over the creation.